Asset Management Features

User-defined stock condition structure    
User-defined property classifications    
User-defined property characteristics    
Multiple Schedules of Rates    
Unique extrapolation process    
Cloning optional    
Exception reports    
Maintenance history    
Warranty details    
Investment cost forecasting User defined timeframes & year bands  
  Inflation modelling  
Using due dates or planned dates  
On-screen result drill-down  
Graphical reporting  
Flexible export options inc Ms Excel  
What-if scenarios  
   
Decent Homes / Quality Standards Multiple quality standards Decent Homes
    Decent Homes Plus
Scottish Housing Quality Standard
Welsh Housing Quality Standard
Local Quality Standard
 
Rules-based processing  
Outcomes automatically updated  
Current position or future trends  
Inflation modelling  
Uses due date or planned date  
Tenant Refusals  
   
Energy assessment Integrated with leading SAP engines  
  SAP, rdSAP, and NHER  
Ratings automatically updated  
Average SAP report  
EPC support  
What-if scenarios  
Fuel poverty reporting  
   
EcoHomes XB support    
What-if scenario modelling Work substitution  
  Lifecycle variations  
Remaining life variations  
Attribute substitution  
Attribute removal  
Multi-faceted scenarios  
Base data unchanged by scenarios  
   
Sustainability modelling User defined property performance modelling  
Planned programme creation Based on investment models  
  Based on decency / quality standards  
Using cloned or extrapolated data  
Due date / planned date comparison  
Calculates programme cost  
   
HHSRS - full or indicative    
Regulatory returns    
NROSH extracts    
Integration and Interfaces Integrated with Planned Maintenance, Asbestos and Servicing & Inspection and Component Accounting  
  Housing Management Systems  
Repairs Systems  
   
Handheld data collection User-defined survey designs  
  Intuitive survey designer  
Optional walk-order and mandatory fields  
Survey scheduling  
New or validation surveys  
Desk based post survey validation  

Extrapolation or Cloning

If you are like most social landlords, you do not have the luxury of owning stock condition data for ALL of your stock. So, how do you report whole stock costs, decency and quality when you only have partial data? Keystone is unique in the range of options that it offers in this respect - from simple cloning to progressive extrapolation. The choice is yours - and we make sure you make an informed choice as part of implementation.

Cloning, as most people know, involves copying stock condition data from surveyed assets to those that have not been surveyed. Hence you have a fully populated database, with survey data recorded for every asset - even though, of course, a significant amount of the data is not ‘real’.

An extrapolated database typically only contains ‘real’ data - assets that have not been surveyed will not have associated stock condition data. When the system produces reports, it mathematically multiplies the costs calculated for the surveyed assets, to give an indication of estimated costs for the whole stock. Assets that have not been surveyed will be assigned a likelihood or probability of requiring works, rather than the apparent certainty suggested by a cloned database. Keystone’s unique progressive extrapolation option takes the mathematics a step further by taking into account all of the ‘real’ stock condition data associated with un-surveyed assets - data that has typically come from actual events, such as completed works, rather than surveys - and hence making cost, decency and quality calculations ever more accurate.