“The most functionally advanced
asset management solution.
The most complete service
offering.
The highest levels of
client service.
No other company
or system goes so far,
yet never
leaves service or quality behind.”
| User-defined stock condition structure | ||
| User-defined property classifications | ||
| Multiple Schedules of Rates | ||
| Unique extrapolation process | ||
| Cloning optional | ||
| Exception reports | ||
| Maintenance history | ||
| Warranty details | ||
| Investment cost forecasting | User defined timeframes & year bands | |
| Inflation modelling | ||
| Using due dates or planned dates | ||
| On-screen result drill-down | ||
| Graphical reporting | ||
| Flexible export options inc Ms Excel | ||
| What-if scenarios | ||
| Decent Homes / Quality Standards | Multiple quality standards | Decent Homes |
| Decent Homes Plus | ||
| Scottish Housing Quality Standard | ||
| Welsh Housing Quality Standard | ||
| Local Quality Standard | ||
| Rules-based processing | ||
| Outcomes automatically updated | ||
| Current position or future trends | ||
| Inflation modelling | ||
| Uses due date or planned date | ||
| Energy assessment | Integrated with leading SAP engines | |
| SAP, rdSAP, and NHER | ||
| Ratings automatically updated | ||
| Average SAP report | ||
| EPC option | ||
| What-if scenarios | ||
| What-if scenario modelling | Work substitution | |
| Lifecycle variations | ||
| Remaining life variations | ||
| Attribute substitution | ||
| Attribute removal | ||
| Multi-faceted scenarios | ||
| Base data unchanged by scenarios | ||
| Planned programme creation | Based on investment models | |
| Based on decency / quality standards | ||
| User-friendly drag and drop | ||
| Using cloned or extrapolated data | ||
| Due date / planned date comparison | ||
| Calculates programme cost | ||
| HHSRS - full or indicative | ||
| Regulatory returns | ||
| NROSH extracts | ||
| Integration and Interfaces | Integrated with Planned Maintenance, Asbestos and Servicing & Inspection |
|
| Housing Management Systems | ||
| Repairs Systems | ||
| Handheld data collection | User-defined survey designs | |
| Intuitive survey designer | ||
| Optional walk-order and mandatory fields | ||
| Survey scheduling | ||
| New or validation surveys | ||
| Desk based post survey validation |
If you are like most social landlords, you do not have the luxury of owning stock condition data for ALL of your stock. So, how do you report whole stock costs, decency and quality when you only have partial data? Keystone is unique in the range of options that it offers in this respect - from simple cloning to progressive extrapolation. The choice is yours - and we make sure you make an informed choice as part of implementation.
Cloning, as most people know, involves copying stock condition data from surveyed assets to those that have not been surveyed. Hence you have a fully populated database, with survey data recorded for every asset - even though, of course, a significant amount of the data is not ‘real’.
An extrapolated database typically only contains ‘real’ data - assets that have not been surveyed will not have associated stock condition data. When the system produces reports, it mathematically multiplies the costs calculated for the surveyed assets, to give an indication of estimated costs for the whole stock. Assets that have not been surveyed will be assigned a likelihood or probability of requiring works, rather than the apparent certainty suggested by a cloned database. Keystone’s unique progressive extrapolation option takes the mathematics a step further by taking into account all of the ‘real’ stock condition data associated with un-surveyed assets - data that has typically come from actual events, such as completed works, rather than surveys - and hence making cost, decency and quality calculations ever more accurate.